when we are born nobody marks our dispositions-whether good or bad,desirable or undesirable,acceptable and abominable. until we grow into priced bones and a concise of possibilities of future yield we don't deserve any yardstick of the being. neither we know what is good and bad until we participate in either of it. the books, the sources, the dimensions-deep,frothy,fragile,inimical help us buy the prevailing. as we nod each time we know there's still some indistinct to us. we are languid then to forage for the further realism and a better meaning as we still reside in the schism between good and bad. we don't reserve any thought for impending vile for we are assured that nothing of that sort has ever besieged the entire of us-'worldhood', if we can say. we are barely assailed by choices and undercurrents. we bore the heavy trudge of the chief giver, the infallible. we break our mind into splinters to be a part of thriving means not finding our own to salvage ourselves if forced prudence gives way.

We have read about scholars and theorists belonging to different schools of thoughts. they don't embrace any chasm or schism. legal theorist Austin accorded authority in absolute one while Rousseau invested people with power.do any of them belong to the swimming area between the deep and shallow water. whether delusion or realism banks on a conflict between a collective perspective and our own shaped,distorted,stimulated by an unbridled pursuit ....but it is still our own...we learn to climb the ladder of evocative and speculative alike ..we learn when we all say 'we beg to diifer' but being presumptuous is simply being overt and a temerity to create glib waves out of clear ripples. those who cash in on situations aiming to act vagrant fly kites in a room with ceiling..is it a wonder or a waste of the seeming wonder..?..what was the great deal or force in rss argument that M.F Hussain's paintings are derogatory to Hindu belief..to me they were maleficent towards Hussain with a circuitous hope to gain political mileage and to gain a mb space in transient memory corpse of public. religion is a facade we live in allowing ragtag to brew their identification-specifics.these are relative contingent upon our personal ramifications. the competitive spirit works in high vigour much to my surprise. all are pitted against each other in monstrous identification rampage..identification is a mere chimera unless supplied with trappings of religion.religion is a primary contour in the face of identification. the latter is a fantasy brought into being by religious rigours. just as the pallid soil deepens with the supplied water so as the identification is reinforced through the religious parameters.

those who classify between good and bad,proper and improper do it so on the basis of their understanding of good and bad,willed and devised.it doesnt by itself render anything good or bad. if it does so by accidental worth it is a delusion of grandeur they live in while we in the myth. the upshot is mirage, an untoward meaning and forthcoming spree of discordance. its us who live like we love to be in oblivion forever.can we afford to subsist in the stale of parochial? can we discreetly cut the tentacles away?are we up for nouveau power of liberalism?